Tweet about this on Twitter Email this to someone Share on LinkedIn
logo-ivar
logo
background

The Role & Contribution
of Community Organisations

Funded by arrow""

icon

Funded by


The main study was funded by Local Government Improvement and Development (now the LGA) and the Execution Charitable Trust.

 

Seed funded by IVAR’s Research Development Fund.

 

Read more about the fund.

 

When we initiated this study, there was mounting pressure on community-based organisations to ‘demonstrate’ and ‘evidence’ that they had an impact. At the same time, government was showing renewed interest in the difference that organisations can make to their local areas.

 

This study was about community-based organisations determining for themselves how their impact should be assessed and about concentrating on the kinds of impact that they knew to be important to local people.

background

What difference do community organisations make?

 

How should impact be assessed?

Timing

Summer 2009 to Autumn 2010

 

Numbers

Collaboration with nine community organisations

 

Places

In three parts of England (Bradford, Bristol and Exeter)

 

Brief

To generate new insights into the difference that community organisations make to the communities where they work; and to develop a shared understanding of what an appropriate, meaningful and proportionate approach to impact assessment might look like.

 

Process

Collaborative action research. Carried out in two stages called ‘Inquiry’ and ‘Action’. During the inquiry stage, we held open space events and workshops with the community organisations to think about ‘How do we assess our impact?’ and ‘What are the issues?’ In the ‘Action’ stage we developed and then tested out three different ways of assessing impact.

 

Nine community organisation

The nine community organisations we worked with described themselves as ‘multi-purpose’. They offered many different kinds of services, activities and facilities to people, groups and organisations in their local area. They were involved with social, economic and environmental well-being in the area. Typically they are located in a building which is open to local people and may also host other community groups and organisations.

 

  • Action for Business Limited
  • Bede House Association
  • Bradford Trident New Deal for Communities
  • Cambridge House
  • Exeter Community Initiatives
  • Newlands Community Association
  • Ockment Community Centre Association
  • Teignmouth Community Association
  • Time and Talents Association
angle-up

Terminology arrow""

icon

Terminology


Impact:
 The difference the whole organisation (as distinct from individual projects or programmes) makes to communities over the long term.

Community: The individuals, groups and organisations in an area.

quote

It’s a place where people who feel like they’re not useful come and feel useful.”

The Role & Contribution of Community Organisations 2

1/5

What we learned about impact assessment


People use many different words to talk about outcomes and impact.


What matters is that community organisations and their funders make time to arrive at a shared understanding of those terms.

The Role & Contribution of Community Organisations 2

2/5

It isn't helpful to search for the 'best' way to assess impact.

 

The context in which community organisations operate is significant. No single approach will fit in every case.

The Role & Contribution of Community Organisations 2

3/5

It's not always clear why organisations or their funders think impact assessment is going to be useful.

 

We've seen many examples where the rationale for undertaking this hard work is weak.

The Role & Contribution of Community Organisations 2

4/5

Preoccupation with selecting an impact assessment tool.

 

This can lead an organisation to undertake complex work that matches neither their needs nor their circumstances.

The Role & Contribution of Community Organisations 2

5/5

Community organisations do much of their work in collaboration with others.


For example when they help improve the local environment or pull pots of money to make a service happen. It makes more sense to let organisations tell a 'contribution' not an 'attribution' story about how a grant has helped.

Place based funding

1/3

Developing a framework for action

In 2015, we undertook a study of place-based approaches. The research aimed to shed light on the place-based approaches used by UK trusts and foundations and identify learning about the pitfalls and successes of these approaches. Out of this, and other work around place, we have developed a framework for place-based approaches to support funders in their planning and implementation.

Place based funding

2/3

Who is it for?

 

Staff and trustees at charitable trusts and foundations who have responsibility for making strategic decisions about funding approaches or who are leading the delivery of a place-based programme. Community foundations and local funders may also find the framework useful.

Place based funding

3/3

What is it for?

 

The framework is simply a way of organising a conversation when planning or reviewing place-based work in order to: 

 

  • Help surface assumptions and different opinions when working with multiple partners

  • Provide a structure or checklist for use when planning an approach or reflecting on progress

  • Support the sharing of thinking and improving transparency

 

The purpose is not to identify good or bad practice but rather to provide a prompt for discussions, helping funders to consider key questions about place-based approaches

Download the full report

Front cover image for assessing the impact of multi purpose community organisations

Research reports:

Assessing the impact of multi-purpose community organisations

Leila Baker, Mike Aiken, Helen Garforth, Lucy Heady


quote

If it were possible to press a button and get a simple answer to the impact question, organisations would have done it years ago. Impact assessment is not an appropriate path for all organisations and particularly not for small groups. Above all, it is important that community organisations, funders and policy makers work out why, when and for whom impact needs to be assessed.”

Steve Wyler, Locality CEO at the time of publication, June 2011

We have developed principles for thinking about impact, so that community organisations would be better placed to negotiate with their funders about how their work is assessed.

Since finishing this study we have used these principles in conversations with both community organisations and funders. They make sense to people, they are tried and tested and they seem to help. Impact assessment needs to:

  • Be appropriate, meaningful and proportionate to the particular organisation
  • Have a clear rationale and purpose – this can help decide if it is appropriate or not
  • Be fit for purpose – this can help decide whether it is proportionate or not
  • Be relevant to the organisation and its funder – this can help decide whether it is going to produce meaningful results


Read more about the IVAR approach to impact.

angle-up

Seed funded by IVAR’s Research Development Fund. Main study funded by Local Government Improvement and Development (now the LGA) and Execution Charitable Trust.

 

Carried out with Danny Burns (Institute of Development Studies) and New Philanthropy Capital.

 

During the project we shared and developed our work thanks to opportunities from the Community Foundation Network, NCVO/VSSN, BIVAR, TSRC and The Barrow Cadbury Foundation.

 
Aiken, M. (2009) Impact of community anchors: towards a conceptual framework for research: discussion document, London: IVAR.

 

IVAR (2011) Assessing the impact of multi-purpose community organisations: Final report of a collaborative action research approach, London: IVAR.

angle-up

Learn more about IVAR