Building Health Partnerships
Drawn from our experience of running a number of large-scale programmes.
Developed and delivered in partnership with:
Big Lottery Fund
Department of Health
The Building Health Partnerships: Self Care (BHP) programme ran in eight STPs over 12 months from July 2017, with the aim of building relationships between STPs, citizens and the VCSE to facilitate joint action that improves health and care priorities.
With the NHS facing a series of well-known critical challenges, it is in desperate need of new care models that are sustainable and flexible to our changing society.
Using action learning approaches, we support tangible improvements to the design, commissioning and delivery of local health services.
Patients and communities driving progress in self care
This briefing reports on the Building Health Partnerships Self Care programme and the seven areas where it operated in 2017-2018.
It breaks the usual mould and enables a new and fresh dialogue between statutory organisations/services and the voluntary and community sector.’
BHP in ...
The BHP programme is about facilitating a conversation between local people, VCSEs and public agencies. The process involves the following elements:
- The ‘core group’. This is made up of people from all relevant sectors within the STP area. This group is central to the process. They help set the context for the facilitators, drive activity and model good ways of working. Making sure this group has the right membership is essential. It must include champions of collaborative working from the statutory and VCSE sectors.
- Full partnership sessions. Four to five half-day sessions, involving all interested parties within the STP area. They provide the space for people from different sectors to work together to design change to local health services and to develop joint action plans.
- Independent facilitators from IVAR. The facilitator ‘holds’ the process. They develop an understanding of the context, and design partnership meetings that are spaces where multiple voices can be heard. They also organise agendas, troubleshoot and help build relationships and networks, drawing in new perspectives. Facilitators are experienced in bringing together multi-agency and multi-disciplinary groups of people to build consensus, solve dilemmas, implement plans, deliver training and develop strategy.
- Leadership training. Cross-sector individuals from each area are invited to attend training, delivered by IVAR and The Kings Fund, in order to develop their skills, behaviours and attitudes to support local transformation. People attending can then take back what they have learned in order to champion this way of working, locally and nationally, and sow the seeds for further collaborative approaches. This enables individuals to play an ongoing role in transformation and influence and helps to create a legacy of collaboration in the BHP areas.
The NHS is facing a number of critical challenges including an ever-increasing population and people living longer, with more complex, long-term conditions. In this climate of changing health needs and stretched resources, multi-stakeholder partnerships at a community level are needed to develop new ways of working in order to find local solutions.
People’s health is determined by a range of social, economic and environmental factors. For example, there is a clear correlation between poverty, poor health and early death. There is also evidence that links the amount of control people have over their lives with their and health and wellbeing. Health agencies are, therefore, increasingly interested in the role of prevention and partnership working. By listening to local people’s concerns and increasing their confidence and skills in self care, and by fostering relationships between communities, health professionals and VCSE organisations, we can address people’s needs in a more holistic way, tackle health inequalities and support individuals to take greater control of their own health.
In order to support people to stay well, for longer, in their communities we need to look together at the support people need alongside hospital and GP care. Community-centred and social prescribing approaches, as well as the role of VCSE organisations in delivering them, are increasingly being recognised as a way to address the wider factors that affect people’s health and wellbeing.
Small VCSE organisations are often the first to respond to ‘hyper-local’ needs and provide spaces where people feel safe and respected. They tend to focus on general wellbeing and have been described by public sector stakeholders as ‘the glue that holds communities together’. They are valued for having an ‘open door approach that means people are not turned away’. However, evidence also points to a mismatch between what many small community organisations do (their distinctiveness and social value) and how many public and voluntary sector programmes are funded.
There are of course challenges on both sides to community-centred working. It is not easy to reach the most marginalised populations or to identify where your approach or organisational culture may need to change. There are also financial constraints and limitations of short-term projects and programmes.
The NHS Five Year Forward View recognised the role VCSE organisations could play, in partnership with the NHS, to help deliver its vision. At a strategic level, NHS England is committed to working with VCSEs and establishing models for more equitable partnerships and better integration, and to increase the influence of the voice of patients. More locally, STPs, as with any relatively new player in a system, are taking time to build consistently high and constructive levels of engagement with VCSE organisations and communities more widely.
The BHP programme was designed in response to all these challenges, to work intensively with statutory services to test and pilot new approaches to partnership working. Over the last year, the programme has run in eight STP areas, with learning being shared across England.
‘We will work collaboratively with the voluntary sector and primary care to design a common approach to self care and social prescribing, including how to make it systematic and equitable.’
NHS England, Five Year Forward View
More from BHP Self Care
There are a number of reports you may find useful – find a full list of further reading on the Social Enterprise UK website.
Briefing One: Improving self care at a local level.
Are you interested in how STPs are working with the voluntary sector and local people to design health and care services? Do you want to know how self care is perceived at a local level? Or where to start with setting up partnership working?
24 October 2017
'My hope is that once and for all, progress is made'
Maggie Sanderson is a carer who attended the first Herefordshire and Worcestershire partnership meeting for Building Health Partnerships. Here, she shares why she went along and what she hopes the programme will achieve.
We are currently working with eight areas to build health partnerships around self care, bringing local people together with public agencies, VCSE’s to share insights, generate ideas and develop a joint approach.
Follow #BHPselfcare on Twitter for the latest or visit the Social Enterprise UK website for more details about the eight areas.
visit the SEUK site
What are the benefits?
- Establish cross sector relationships, working together to overcome obstacles
- Senior level appreciation and commitment to the VCSE offer
- VCSEs become strategic partners with public agencies
- Creates readiness for change and challenge – allowing ideas to be turned into action
- A common language for talking about improvements to health and well-being
- Co-designed, integrated, asset-based approaches that provide local solutions
- Meets the health and well-being needs of local people more effectively
What factors make it work?
- Timing: The importance of seeing change as a process, rather than an event, allowing relationships to be built and ideas to be turned into action
- Commitment and buy-in: Senior level, cross sector, diverse involvement
- Bespoke and independent facilitation: A high level of support and access to experts and resources
- Dual focus: On relationship building as well as joint action
- Not rushing into action: Participants are grappling with complex, emerging structures and unfamiliar opportunities: for new, joint initiatives to have a chance of being useful and effective, the foundations (relationships, common ground, mutual understanding) will need to be in place
We definitely got in shape quicker and made more progress in a short space of time because of the programme.”
What are the challenges?
- Too many competing drivers and outcome frameworks for cross sector working e.g inconsistent approaches to integration and silo working
- The voluntary sector is diverse: there are community links to tap into and expertise, but little capacity to engage and a high risk of duplication and overlap
- A lack of opportunity to stand back, reflect and explore possibilities to tackle the difficult issues that block progress
Learn more about IVAR